The Law of God & Those Who Love It

The influence of antinomianism and of antinomian sympathy in the new American version of Christianity represents a significant threat to how well the Christian Church gives honor to her LORD. False inferences about the place of the Law of God within the New Covenant have led many to create a radically unbiblical dichotomy between genuine Christian faith and commandment keeping. Today, in most American churches, and in the mind of the overwhelming majority of those who profess to know and follow Christ, there is essentially no sense of obligation whatsoever to keep the commandments of God, to know and understand the commandments of God, or to even consider the commandments of God in any way whatsoever. But the New Testament Scriptures, those that come from the pen of God, the Holy Spirit, that originate in Christ, tell a far different story about the place of the Law of God and the commandments of God in the life of the true disciples of Christ. Those who love God will not only love God’s commandments, they will keep them. And those that despise God’s commandments, those who ignore them, those who live a life defined by commandment breaking are described in Scripture as hating God. Those whose lives are defined by commandment breaking, who claim to love God, Scripture says quite emphatically, are liars. What does living the law of God in the life and community of grace actually look like?

 The translation, “commandment” appears 145 times in 138 verses in the NASB. In contradistinction to that, grace appears 122 times in 114 verses. I think most people would find this fact stunning since modern American Christians are prone to talk about grace at a ratio no less than 1000:1 in my experience. In fact, if you pay close enough attention to people, even in our conservative, reformed churches, they often recoil at examples of the harshness of divine wrath. But words like righteous, holy, and just are still words that accurately describe attributes of the God revealed in Scripture, the God that is. Contrary to the pop-Christianity of American culture, God is still very interested in whether or not men are keeping His commandments and He is especially concerned when those who claim to love Him hardly give the divine fiat a wink and a nod, all in the name of grace. The notion that Jesus Christ came to correct the Old Testament’s picture of God is modern propaganda at best and a most pernicious deception hoisted on churches by mostly unregenerate pastors hired by mostly unregenerate congregations to tickle their unregenerate ears.

The Greek Imperative

The Greek imperative is used 1621 times in 1198 verses. As I pointed out to “Ted” in my recent exchange with him, the sheer volume of imperatives appearing in the New Testament documents indicate that at the very least, the authors thought they had some sort of authority and they expected their audiences to submit to these imperatives. There isn’t a single book in the entire NT Canon that does not have imperatives in it. The imperative is used 845 times in the gospels. Paul uses it 420 times. The Catholic Epistles employ the imperative 144 times. The Apocalypse uses it on 88 occasions. Finally, Acts contains 124 instances of the imperative. In light of such basic information, it is impossible to read the New Testament without recognizing that these documents consider themselves to be binding on the reader. The Greek imperative, while not always a command, was still the most common use of the imperative in the New Testament. The imperative expresses an attempt to bring about a desired action through the agency of another, that is, to impose one’s will on another or to give another direction. (Young, Intermediate New Testament Greek) Moreover, there were several other constructions used in the New Testament to express the concept of command.

Μη with the aorist subjunctive and ου with the future indicative are two other examples. Suffice it to say that the power, authority, and binding nature of Scripture is clearly expressed by Scripture itself. In other words, we don’t need a complex philosophical argument or a logical syllogism to see that the nature of Scripture is that it stands over us with full authority in every sense of the word. Moreover, we do not argue with young believers that the Scriptures are authoritative. We simply teach it ipso facto from what Scripture teaches about itself and expect them to embrace it. We also graciously help the young person understand the consequences of rejecting such basic teachings. 

The Commandment and the Christian

With this information in hand, how should Christians understand the divine commandments? How should we view the practice of commandment keeping? I will ask you to do your best to ignore most of what you have heard from modern evangelicals and engage the Scriptures to see what they say about the subject.

Matthew 5:17-20 makes it abundantly clear that Jesus did not come to abolish, destroy, or do away with the Law, but rather to fulfill it. The Law of Moses is to be interpreted through the Christ event for it was to Christ that Moses pointed. Jesus said that the great and foremost commandment is “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.” And the second great commandment is like it, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.” (Matt. 22:37-39) As we study the commandments in Exodus 20, we realize that they are essentially, an explanation of the two great commandments referenced by Christ in the NT. From this we conclude that Jesus was not hostile toward the practice of commandment keeping and in fact, kept the commandments of God and expected His disciples to do the same. Much more could be said about Christ’s commands to His followers, but the nature of blogging just doesn’t support further elaboration on this point.

Finally, we turn to Matthew 28 and Christ’s great commission, which was given directly to his immediate disciples. These original disciples turned apostles with all the author that such a term carries, were commanded to make disciples of all nations as they went out, or as they were going along their way. Second, they were to be baptizing these disciples in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Third, they were to be teaching these new disciples to obey and keep every single commandment He gave them. When was the last time you heard a teacher, preacher, or pastor inform his audience that every Christian has an abiding and urgent obligation in all places and at all times to obey every single commandment that Christ gives us in the New Covenant? Commandment keeping is just as much a part of Christian life as missionary work and as baptism and as Christian teaching. But because of false teachings promulgated by false teachers, grace has been abused and perverted to the point that commandment keeping is no longer part of the Christian culture in most modern American churches.

Paul wrote 13 of the documents that make up the NT Canon. In those 13 documents, he employed the imperative mood 420 times. In 1 Corinthians 7:19, Paul said, “Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but what matters is the keeping of the commandments of God.” When was the last time we heard that what matters is that we fear God and keep His commandments? Paul thought it was important. Jesus taught that it was a non-negotiable. Timothy knew that Paul was serious about commandment keeping when he read, “I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who testified the good confession before Pontius Pilate, that you keep the commandment without stain or reproach until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ.” (1 Tim. 6:13-14) There is a lot more to this conversation and space dictates that I save that for another time.

If the Scriptures are not authoritative and binding, and they are not the infallible Word of God, then Christianity reduces to just a component of one’s worldview. It may even reflect a large component of a person’s worldview. But it cannot actually be their worldview. It can only be a part of their greater worldview. And that is precisely what we see in men like “Ted.” Men like Ted actually reject God’s word and along with, those commandments that dictate Christian behavior.

• We allow young Christians to question whether or not a commandment is a commandment.
• We tolerate people who argue that the Bible is not the Word of God, that it is not authoritative, not binding, and not infallible.
• We debate people over the issue same-sex perversion without communicating that we reject their faith as genuine and view their arguments as a reflection of the spirit of antichrist in nature.
• We even debate whether or not murdering a baby in the womb is a woman’s right as a Christian.
• We tolerate people living together without being married.
• We wink at at-will divorce and refuse to bring discipline to bear on the sin of it.

I know God is a God of grace as much as anyone. I have sinned against God since I was regenerated 36 years ago in awful ways and far more often than I care to think about. But that is no excise for me or anyone else to toss the ancient non-negotiable Christian practice of commandment keeping out the window. To love law breaking is to hate the law. To love violating God’s commandments is to hate God. Yet, we find ourselves in these quibbles with men like “Ted” who obviously have no use for the God revealed in Scripture, for God’s word, or for the sacred commandments. It is this attitude that we must embrace toward all those who seek to weaken to destroy the grip of Scripture on the life of the Christian.        

 

Spurgeon spoke of this element in his own day, “As for those whose ungodly lives stare them in the face, so far from being saved by their pretended faith, they are trees twice dead, plucked up by the roots. If they say they continue in sin that grace may abound, their damnation is just. The salvation of Christ is not a salvation in sin, but a salvation from sin. They who would be saved by him must come and trust him just as they are, and he will enable them to forsake their sin; but while they continue to say, "We will take pleasure in sin," there is no salvation possible for them. God bring us to Christ, and nail our sins to his cross, and give us life in our Savior's life. Amen.”

Jude warns his readers, “For certain persons have crept in unnoticed, those who were long beforehand marked out for this condemnation, ungodly persons who turn the grace of our God into licentiousness and deny our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ.” (Jude 4)

Returning to Paul, he wrote in another place, “I am afraid that when I come again my God may humiliate me before you, and I may mourn over many of those who have sinned in the past and not repented of the impurity, immorality and sensuality which they have practiced.” (2 Cor. 12:21)

Holiness: The Endangered Species in Christian Living

For years liberal theology, the academy, and a plethora of movements in the Christian community have managed to shift the focus of the Christian church from simple biblical truths and godly living to a variety of other issues. Christians have been distracted by psychology, social justice, politics, dominion thinking, seekers, emergents, the restless, and philosophy, just to name a few. We have been busy feeling good about ourselves, thinking of God in the same vein as we think of our fallen, wicked, materialistic daddy, repositioning sin, learning how not to trust the bible, increasing the age of the earth, doing away with hell, redefining marriage, and even reducing Jesus to just an amazing man, but a man nonetheless. We have been diligently destroying every shred of orthodoxy ever discovered across the history of Christianity. To inherit a tradition is simply naïve, unpopular, and rather boring. In the process of all this, we have lost our way and become nothing more than just one more social network among thousands of social networks. We are not a counter-culture movement at all. Rather, we want as much of the culture as we can possibly get our hands on. One of the first things I learned, as a new Christian in the late 70s was that God is holy and so too are His followers. To be a Christian in that day was to live a holy life. Gone are the days when Christians speak about holiness with that kind of soberness and conviction. But there is this book, called the Bible. The Bible still talks to us about holiness with absolute soberness, and conviction and if we know what is good for us; we will listen.

There is an antinomianism in modern Christianity that could come from no other source than the devil himself. It is the duty of every Christian, pastor, elder, and professor to recognize this thinking and do something about it. Does the NT really speak to us about love, about social justice, about not being judgmental, about being accepting and tolerant of all views and lifestyles? There is nothing remotely resembling the message that some people claim is the message of the ancient NT writers in first-century Christianity.

For example, in Gal. 5:19-21, Paul lists a number of behaviors that he finds completely unacceptable and off-limits for any Christian. He places sexual immorality at the top of his list. This not only includes sex outside of biblical marriage, but gay sex as well. Yet I read an article today about the numbers of Christian women who claim to love Christ but are reading or have read the 50 Shades of Grey pornography. The contradiction is obvious. At the end of this list, Paul informs the Galatian Christians that the ones practicing these things will not inherit the Kingdom of God.

Again, in his writings to the Corinthian Christians, Paul constructs another list of forbidden practices. At 1 Cor. 6:9, Paul in his rebuke of the practice of taking fellow Christians to court informs the Corinthians that unrighteous people will not inherit the Kingdom of God. He then adds; neither fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, effeminate, and, homosexuals. In addition he lists such sins as drunkenness, and covetousness. He then says, such were some of you, but you were washed, but you were sanctified, but you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of God. Contrast this Christian teaching with the modern claims of supposed Christians. Entire denominations are ordaining homosexual men to lead their churches. Others are marrying homosexual couples without apology. Of course some scholars attempt to take the basic Christian teaching on holiness and make it much more complex than it is. Satan has filled their arrogant noodles with all sorts of conjecture and speculation about how nothing could ever be as simple as the Bible, at face value, seems to teach that it is.

The basic problem is found in how modern Christians view sin. J.C. Ryle, in his work on Holiness, wrote, "The plain truth is that a right knowledge of sin lies at the root of all saving Christianity. Without it, such doctrines as justification, conversion, sanctification, are words and names which convey no meaning to the mind." [J.C. Ryle, Holiness, 1] Our view of sin must change if we are to understand the nature of what it means to be a Christian. We have not joined some religious social club. Something extraordinary and radical has taken place in our lives. We were dead in trespasses and sin but now we are alive unto God.

Peter provides some very sober words regarding how Christians must conduct their lives. First, Christians are to prepare their minds for action. The Christian mind is their greatest weapon in their fight not only against temptation to lust, lie, cheat, and steal, it is their greatest tool for honoring God. The significance of the mind cannot be overstated in Christian life. When we think poorly about behavior, we sin. When we think poorly about God, we commit heresy. When we think poorly about Scripture, we are deceived. When we think autonomously, we are idolaters. Holiness is rooted in the mind as much as it is expressed everywhere else in the human person. The mind that was blind is now made to see, not only the light of truth, but how that light should produce good thoughts, good deeds, and good thinking in the life of the Christian.

Next, Peter tells his audience not to be conformed to the former lusts of the flesh. This is a common theme throughout the NT. Lusts were as prevalent then as they are today. The Christian is given the charge to discipline those things out of his or her life. Peter says we are to keep sober. The idea to be in charge of one's thought processes, even to not think in an irrational way. Why are we to do these things? Peter says, because it is written, "You shall be holy for I am holy." In other words, we are to be like God.

Jesus said, "He who does not take up his cross daily and follow me is not worthy of me." (Matt. 10:38) One blogger, convinced that Christians should not judge the world wrote that if we just love the world they way Jesus did, they would come running to Christianity. This blogger surely does not understand the nature of sin. Jesus preached repentance from sin. Jesus said He came to bring division. Jesus said the world stands already condemned. And the world did not come running to Him. They butchered Him upon a cross in the most humiliating execution at their disposal. The life of the Christian is a life of holiness. It is a life of self-denial. Paul said, I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live. Yet not I, but Christ lives in me! And the life I now live, I live by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave Himself for me." (Gal. 2:20) Christian, your life is not your own. You have been bought with a price. It is hid with Christ in God. Act like it.