There is an English idiom that people often use when they
think another person is not accurately interpreting what they are
communicating. They will say, “You are putting words in my mouth.” For the injured
party, the experience can be quite displeasing. It is never polite to speak
presumptuously for another. It is exceedingly dangerous when you are doing so
for God.
‘But the prophet who speaks a word presumptuously in My name
which I have not commanded him to speak, or which he speaks in the name of
other gods, that prophet shall die.’ (Deut. 18:20) zîd is frequently used to refer to three specific aspects of pride.
One is presumption. Because a person is proud he presumes too much in his
favor, especially in the sense of authority. For instance, the false prophet
was one who presumed to speak in the name of God, assuming authority to do so,
without having been called (Deut 18:20; cf. v. 22 for use of the noun
derivative).[1]
It does not take lofty critical skills to understand very quickly where the sin rests. Moreover, if you are not immediately humbled and tremble at the realization of what this passages reveals, you should be.
It does not take lofty critical skills to understand very quickly where the sin rests. Moreover, if you are not immediately humbled and tremble at the realization of what this passages reveals, you should be.
When I was initially regenerated and baptized into Christ,
it was in the Pentecostal Church. My spiritual leaders taught me that God still
speaks inspired utterances through human beings down to the present day. This
is a common Pentecostal/Charismatic doctrine. Benny Hinn made the following
prophecy in 1989: "The Spirit tells me - Fidel Castro will die - in the
90's. Oooh my! Some will try to kill him and they will not succeed. But there
will come a change in his physical health, and he will not stay in power, and
Cuba will be visited of God." Then again: "The Lord also tells me to
tell you in the mid 90's, about '94-'95, no later than that, God will destroy
the homosexual community of America. [audience applauds] But He will not destroy
it - with what many minds have thought Him to be, He will destroy it with fire.
And many will turn and be saved, and many will rebel and be destroyed." In
light of where we are on this issue and the fact that Castro did not die in the
90s, I think I am safe in saying that Benny Hinn is a false prophet. If Hinn
were living in ancient Hebrew times, the penalty would have been death. No man
may take the Word of God in arrogance and he certainly cannot pretend His words
are God’s words without exposing himself to serious danger.
This egregious error may be difficult for some to see and
easy for others. Whether or not people see it for what it is, is of little
consequence. That fact has no bearing on the righteous judgment of God who will
hold men accountable for their wicked deeds. While most evangelicals are not
Pentecostal and can see the error in this doctrine, we still have a serious
liability every time we encounter the sacred Word of God. After all, the Sacred
Text is not like any other book by virtue of its nature.
Kierkegaard said, “And then the interpretations – 30,000
different interpretations.” Vanhoozer writes, “This mirror image raises what I
believe to be the most important question for contemporary theories of
interpretation, whether of the Bible or of any other book: Is there something
in the text that reflects a reality independent of the reader’s interpretive
activity, or does the text only reflect the reality of the reader?” [Vanhoozer,
Is There A Meaning In The Text? 15] For many modern Christians living in
American culture, Scripture is simply a reflection of our own prejudices and
values. We force one anachronistic interpretation onto the text after another.
When fathers should be attempting to mimic God as Father, American Christians
are busy dragging God down to their versions of the ideal American father. This
is one example of many, committed every week in Sunday Schools, Sermons, and
Bible studies all across our land. Indeed, we have little more regard for
Scripture than we do the blank notebook sitting at our child’s study desk. The
text has become nearly a blank sheet of paper for us to construct whatever kind
of God, Christ, and Christianity we desire. “Humankind is vulnerable to moral
evil, and imagination, perception, and intention can readily be misdirected or deceived
into situations of evil.” [Thistelton, The Hermeneutics of Doctrine, 263] And
so we have engaged in each of these and it is against these we must set
ourselves if we are to rightly handle the Word of God.
Mishandling of the Biblical text is a parlous action. The
level of preparedness one takes in order to treat the text as it deserves, in a
fair and ethical manner, is a reflection of the inner attitude of the
individual Christian. Moreover, the attitude one has concerning the Biblical
text is a replication of the attitude one has toward it’s divine Author, not to
mention one’s own self. If we genuinely recognize the holy character of God the
Author, and the true sinful condition of our own deceptive heart, we cannot
help but approach the text with the deepest levels of humility, coupled with a
passionate enthusiasm to equip ourselves appropriately for the task of receiving
what God has said, not to mention communicating that message to others. “God’s
Word commands our very best because, in the ultimate analysis, it is not a
human word, but the Word of God. This means that our interpretive enterprise
must rest on a robust doctrine of biblical revelation and a high view of
Scripture – as Jesus taught, Scripture is “the word of God” and this “cannot be
broken” (John 10:35).” [Kostenberger, Invitation to Biblical Interpretation,
62]
When we as human beings listen to the Bible, we are
listening to God’s word. We experience his meaning, his control, and his
presence. We learn specifically information and hear specific commands
(meaning); we are transformed as our minds are renewed (control; Rom. 12:1-2);
and we have spiritual communion with him (presence). [Poythress, In the
Beginning Was the Word, 28] One express purpose for Scripture is perlocution. Scripture
comes to our doorstep with the goal of not informing for the sake of informing.
Scripture brings radical transformation goals with it. Scripture has a job to
do on and in our hearts. Hence, if we are busy putting words in God’s mouth,
not only are we engaging in a serious peril, we are cutting off our nose to
spite our face. As a result, God’s work, which is performed by the Holy Spirit
through the application of Scripture in the human mind, does not run its course
because we delight in perverting the holy text, even if we do so out of
ignorance. We must approach the text
with fear and trembling, in all humility. We must not presume that our sinful
heart has no desire to blind us from the truth of God’s revelation. We must
approach the Biblical text in the most guarded manner, knowing the dreadful
state in which we may find ourselves should we presume upon the content
therein. We must acknowledge our utter dependence upon the Spirit, who is
promised to us as an ever present help in the task of understanding the divine
Words of our heavenly Father. By grace, through faith, we know and are certain
that God alone will aid us in our understanding of His Truth. It is when we think
we can obtain a level of expertise using tools of our own devising, with human
reason alone, with our own intellectual power that we expose ourselves to the
peril of presumption and putting words in God’s mouth. A humble reliance on God’s
grace and the aid of His Spirit, coupled with a determined willingness, an
eagerness to acquire the right training, the right skill, it what the Christian
must bring to the Biblical text.
For this reason we also
constantly thank God that when you received the word of God which you heard
from us, you accepted it not as the word of men, but for what it really is, the word of God,
which also performs its work in you who believe (I Thess. 2:13).
[1] Leon
J. Wood, "547 זִיד" In , in
Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament,
ed. R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer, Jr. and Bruce K. Waltke, electronic ed.
(Chicago: Moody Press, 1999), 239.
Thank you for the good wrіteup. ӏt in faсt was a amusemеnt account it.
ReplyDeleteLoοκ аdvanced to moгe addеԁ аgreeable from уou!
By the ωay, hοw can we communiсate?
Feel free to surf my web page ... loans for bad credit