It is in chapter eight that Peter Boghossian’s true colors
emerge. The level of intolerance and bigotry are that Boghossian displays is
not only puzzling for someone who prides himself on being open and not
pretending to know things he does not know, it is frightening. Every person of
faith and every reasonable atheist should read this chapter and walk away with
great concern. One cannot help but wonder if Boghossian will direct his
bullying tactics toward those who are perhaps agnostics next because they don’t
quite agree with his epistemology or his criteria for justification of beliefs.
Every Christian parent should read this book so that he/she can understand the
precise nature of this atheistic war on faith. Boghossian says, “Employing
universities in the struggle against faith is a cornerstone in the larger
strategy to combat faith, promote reason and rationality, and create skeptics.
Many university graduates will become the next generation of leaders and
policymakers. We need to train educators not just to teach students how to
think critically, but also how to nudge attitudes about faith on their downward
spiral.” [Loc. 3205]
Public universities use taxpayers funds in order meet their
operating costs. Many, many of those taxpayers are people of faith. I wonder if
Boghossian realizes that his approach to the “problem of faith” smacks of totalitarianism.
He sounds more like a tyrant than a philosophy professor does. It sounds like
Boghossian wants to use public policy to crush faith from the public square.
Indeed, some philosophers are more dangerous than others are. It is a good
thing this one has such a small platform with such an obviously ridiculous method
for presenting his case.
Boghossian says, “This one word, “faith,” is the end to
rational discourse.” Yet, for eight chapters now, we have waited for some
argument for this conclusion and nothing is offered. Boghossian continues to
expect us to take his statements at face value. We have already indicated that
Boghossian’s definition of faith is spurious. If his definition of faith is
spurious and his entire project hinges on that definition, then the entire
project is spurious.
Boghossian encourages educators to give faithbased
justifications n countenance. He says they should not be taken seriously. He
suggests they should be sent back to the Kid’s Table. I must confess this is an
over the top pompous jerk.
Boghossian then launches into some more of his Socratic questioning
all the while ignoring the obvious fact that the method is a tool that can be
just as useful to the theologian as it is to the philosopher, to the faithful
just as much as it is to the atheist. For example, Boghossian asks the question
if it is possible that some people misconstrue reality. The Christian thinker
will ask, what do you mean by reality? Once that question is asked by the
Christian thinker, Boghossian will likely never get to his second question. The
Christian thinker will press Boghossian on his answer until he reaches the
place where it becomes obvious that Boghossian really cannot provide a rational
account of his view of reality without also stumbling over several
contradictions.
Here is an example of how I would respond to Boghossian using
intervention 1 on Loc. 3531.
PB: Should I talk about how people come to knowledge?
ME: No, you should talk about the various ways that people
claim to come to knowledge. This is a critical
thinking class isn’t it, not PB
personal platform for creating atheists.
PB: But in the process should I not help my students
understand which way is the right way?
ME: So there is only one right way to come to knowledge?
PB: Well, I think reason is the only way to really come to
knowledge.
ME: Do you mean the right way as determined by you or by me,
or by a thousand other philosophers out there?
PB: Silence
I will skip a review of chapter nine. When people begin
comparing faith to the HIV virus, they do not deserve to be taken seriously. I
think such behavior should land Boghossian back in his seat at the kiddies
table. I will wrap up this serious of posts over the weekend with a final
review of Boghossian book and move on.
No comments:
Post a Comment