Sam Harris, in a recent article carried by the Los Angeles
Times, has made, what I consider, an obviously unremarkable attempt to clear up
some basic misunderstanding concerning the teachings of atheism. Apparently
Harris is disturbed by the degree of stigma attached with atheism and this is
his attempt to change the image of the godless and god-hating philosophy. This
is my attempt to discuss whether or not I think Harris is successful. Harris
lists 10 myths people believe about atheists and then tries to set the record straight.
Myth 1: Atheists believe that life is meaningless.
“Our relationships with those we love are meaningful now;
they need not last forever to be made so.” Harris makes no argument for
meaningful lives. He simply makes a statement. Atheism often hides its true
colors and avoids the rational implications of its dearly prized
presuppositions. Harris unwittingly reveals his true feelings about meaning in
his last sentence: Atheists tend to find this fear of meaninglessness … well …
meaningless. Harris is so unconcerned with meaninglessness that he makes it his
first “myth” that others believe about atheists. That sure sounds like it
bothers him to me.
Myth 2: Atheism is responsible for the greatest crimes in
history.
Note that Harris personalizes atheism in myth 1 and
depersonalizes it in myth 2. This is because it is a fact of history that
atheists like Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were responsible for the greatest crimes in
history. It is what we call a historically documented fact! Harris, in a
bizarre move, attempts to blame this fact on religion, interestingly enough.
Apparently, if these atheists had not borrowed dogmatic thinking from religion,
they would not have been such monsters.
Myth 3: Atheism is dogmatic.
“Jews, Christians and Muslims claim that their scriptures
are so prescient of humanity’s needs that they could only have been written
under the direction of an omniscient deity. An atheist is simply a person who
has considered this claim, read the books and found the claim to be ridiculous.”
In reply to Harris, one could rightfully point out that the claims of Christian
theism are only ridiculous if one dogmatically holds to the autonomous
epistemology espoused by atheism. In other words, Christianity and Atheism have
criteria by which beliefs are deemed rational. Both are guilty of dogmatically
holding to that criteria. Christianity is just honest about it.
Myth 4: Atheists think everything in the universe around by
chance
“No one knows why the universe came into being.” Reply, In
the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. There are only two options
in terms of why something exists as opposed to nothing. Either the universe was
caused by something other than itself, or it arose somehow by pure chance. It
is impossible to miss the level of discomfort Harris feels at this point in his
attempt to defend what is obviously indefensible, namely, that something arose
from nothing without a cause.
Myth 5: Atheism has no connection with science
“Although it is possible to be a scientist and still believe
in God — as some scientists seem to manage it — there is no question that an
engagement with scientific thinking tends to erode, rather than support,
religious faith. Taking the U.S. population as an example: Most polls show that
about 90% of the general public believes in a personal God; yet 93% of the
members of the National Academy of Sciences do not. This suggests that there
are few modes of thinking less congenial to religious faith than science is.” I
am always fascinated that men who pride themselves on being scientific or
really intellectual fall into such basic informal fallacies like this one. This
is the fallacy of appeal to authority, specifically, the authority of the many.
Scientists supposed represent the best thinkers, making them the authority in “thinking.”
Christianity does not accept scientific criteria as its final authority for
faith or justified belief. And that is the very squabble that Harris ignores.
Myth 6: Atheists are arrogant
“Pretending to know things one doesn’t know is a profound
liability in science. And yet it is the life-blood of faith-based religion.” Notice
that Harris, in his attempt to disown arrogance actually engages in an
extremely arrogant statement, pretending that Christians have no good reason
for their beliefs. Hello, Mr. Harris, perhaps someone else should have taken up
the atheist’s banner on this one.
Myth 7: Atheists are closed to spiritual experience
“There is nothing that prevents an atheist from experiencing
love, ecstasy, rapture and awe; atheists can value these experiences and seek
them regularly. What atheists don’t tend to do is make unjustified (and
unjustifiable) claims about the nature of reality on the basis of such
experiences.” What atheists cannot do is provide any rational justification for
these experiences and for why they value them. If we are truly molecules in
motion, it only begs the question as to how atheists can be open to spiritual
experience as if being so is virtuous somehow. Once again, Harris claims that
Christians make unjustifiable claims about the nature of reality is simply
wrong. What Christians do is justify their claims to knowledge on the basis of
divine revelation. What Harris should do, in the name of intellectual honesty,
is simply say that he doesn’t like how Christians justify their claim to
knowledge.
Myth 8: Atheists believe that there is nothing beyond human
life and human understanding
Incredibly, Harris does not offer anything more than baseless
speculations about the possibility of advanced extraterrestrial life, that such life would
be atheistic of course, and that such life would be even less impressed with the
Bible than human atheists would. What a waste of time this myth turned out to
be.
Myth 9: Atheists ignore the fact that religion is extremely
beneficial to society
“In any case, the good effects of religion can surely be
disputed. In most cases, it seems that religion gives people bad reasons to
behave well, when good reasons are actually available.” I would love to hear Harris
defend the idea of “good.” What does he mean when he says that people should behave well?
Moreover, what can he possibly mean by “good reasons?” These statements have
morality unavoidably embedded in them. How do we go from slime to fine? How
does a biological accident move from nothing to something of value? Atheism has
no logical ground for acts of kindness, for nobility, or even for heroes. An
atheist who lives a good life does a good thing without a good reason.
Myth 10: Atheism provides no basis for morality
“We decide what is good in our good books by recourse to
moral intuitions that are (at some level) hard-wired in us and that have been
refined by thousands of years of thinking about the causes and possibilities of
human happiness.” Notice that Harris’s answer gives us no good reason to
condemn Stalin, Hitler, or Mao. Apparently their decision about morality was
different from ours. In addition, what about all the crime, and injustice, and
hate that is present in human society. The philosophical problem with Harris’
view is the lack of criteria to get started. How can humanity improve morality
without having something “better” to compare it with? By what standard would we
look at murder thousands of years ago and contemplate that it should be immoral
rather than moral?
The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God.” (Ps.
14:1) The fool has said in his heart, “There is no God,” They are corrupt, and
have committed abominable injustice; There is no one who does good. (Ps. 53:1)
No comments:
Post a Comment