In his book, Covenantal Apologetics, Scott Oliphint
lists what he calls the ten tenets for defending the faith. The objective of
this post is discuss the first tenet: “The faith that we are defending must
begin with, and necessarily include, the triune God – Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit – who, as God, condescends to create and to redeem.” [Oliphint,
Covenantal Apologetics, 55]
Christian apologetics cannot get underway unless the
apologist understands the nature of his enterprise, which is the defense of the
revelation of God in Scripture. Christian apologetics has no interest in
proclaiming and defending some theory of general theism. Far too often, the
apologetic discussion fails to make progress because we have not properly
defined precisely what it is we are defending. We must do a much better job
proclaiming and defending the biblically revealed God as opposed to one of the
many false conceptions or versions of God that exists in the world today.
Unregenerate men have constructed more versions of God than one could possibly
know. It is only by knowing the true God that the Christian apologist can
proclaim and defend Him.
This concept points us up to the fact that Christian
apologetics is not apologetics at all unless it has a theological foundation. In
order for us to understand the God that we endeavor to proclaim and defend, we
must study theology. Moreover, a study of theology requires some familiarity
with exegetical process. In addition, exegetical process rests upon certain
hermeneutical presuppositions. Just in case you were wondering, yes, these
processes and presuppositions also rest upon theological foundations. The
entire enterprise takes on a significantly spherical shape. Not to fear, every
epistemological model ever developed in the history of humanity has been and
will always be spherical in nature. This is one characteristic of epistemology
we are not obligated to secure even if we do wish to illustrate how and why it
is so.
What Oliphint is not saying is that every apologetic
encounter must involve a theological discussion of the trinity. “Rather, we are
saying that we must never assume that we are defending anything but what God
himself, as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, has accomplished in creation and
redemption.” [Ibid. 48-49] Two things emerge in this statement: Christian apologetics
begins with an understanding of the nature and the acts of God. What we see in
many apologetic systems at best is an imbalanced approach stressing one more
than the other or even ignoring one altogether. However, you cannot overemphasize
one without detriment to the other. If you overstress the love of God you will
surely struggle with theodicy when the objection is raised. In addition, if you
focus all your time on the resurrection of Christ, you will struggle when the
objection of open theism presents itself. Christian theism comes to us in a
complete package, not in bits and pieces put together as theologians and
apologists react to attacks and challenges over time. Christian theism, while
containing a biblical philosophy is not philosophy per se.
The Philosopher has created systems in search of truth that
are in large degree modifications due their successive failure, over time, to
deliver on their promise for knowledge. The evolution of philosophy will never
end because it is the unregenerate quest to discover truth, to know, and live
life apart from the Creator. Secular philosophy is the fruitless evolution of
man’s quest for knowledge apart from God. At the end of each theory is the
inevitable agnostic conclusion regarding why things are the way they are. The
answer is simply that the philosopher does not know. In secular philosophy, the
true quest for knowledge ends in mystery, and is as unsatisfying as it is
empty. For Christian theism the case is quite the contrary. Moreover, when
taken as a whole, as it is revealed in Scripture, Christian theism provides the
only satisfying answer to man’s most basic questions. That answer inescapably
begins, and ends with God and God’s acts in redemptive history.
Hence, all the websites, books, and even degree programs allocated
to a philosophical methodology in Christian apologetics have worked to confuse
and obfuscate the apologetic vocation far more than they have facilitated in
making the task unpretentious. Does this mean we ignore the study of philosophy?
I don’t think that is the right answer. I think it is helpful to understand how
these systems are constructed. That understanding proves encouraging to the
believing because we can clearly see the epistemological failures one after
another. However, I do believe there is a balance to such an approach and one
has to use wisdom, spending their time wisely in such endeavors. Believers
should study the basics of secular philosophy. It is important to be able to
speak their language and understand how they think. However, as with anything
there is the danger that we allow ourselves to become so obsessed with secular
philosophy that we ignore other, more important subjects, such as the biblical
languages. There is also the danger of chasing every unbelieving rabbit that
pops its head out of the hole and that is simply not in keeping with godly
wisdom. In fact, that behavior is due more to the fact that some men simply
turn the intellectual pursuit into idolatry while others turn an
anti-intellectual bent into idolatry.
I think the point that Oliphint is getting at in his tenets
is that Christian theism rises or falls as a unit. By its very nature, like
God, it cannot come in bits and pieces. In similar fashion, Christian theology
does not come in pieces either. The parts make up the whole and without the
whole the parts would be unintelligible. Hence, a Christian apologetic, built
upon the diverse and unified system of Christian truth must itself employ a
methodology that faithfully expresses the unity and diversity observed in the
divine revelation of the one true God – Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
No comments:
Post a Comment