In September 2012, Karen King,
the Holland Professor of Divinity at Harvard University published the Gospel of
Jesus Wife papyrus scrap and cause a virtual firestorm of controversy among
Christian scholars. The buzz was loud and sweeping. Everyone was talking about
it, thinking about it, and blogging about it. And some were critically
examining it.
The world wants desperately to
believe that the Christian message is considerably inaccurate. The notion that
Jesus Christ is the only way to God, the only way to heaven, that He is a
loving, gracious, but equally demanding Lord is not an idea that resonates with
unbelievers from any age of culture, especially modern ones.
So it comes as no surprise that
when a Harvard scholar publishes evidence that contradicts the Christian story,
everyone who is looking for a reason not to believe, hoping that they can keep
their sin and autonomy after all, latches onto it with extreme hope and
rapturous delight. The unbeliever thought that Karen King had rescued the world
community from the Christian gospel with her evidence that Jesus actually had a
wife. The world was wrong and now stands not only disappointed, but numb with
embarrassment.
Professor King had argued that
the scrap was dated to about the 4th century. However, upon closer
examination, it appears the date is more like 650-870. This is incredibly late
and serves as a major embarrassment for King. In addition, it appears that the
scrap was actually cut and pasted together. There are also problems with the
handwriting as noted by one paleographer. The handwriting lacks clear
parallels, making analysis extremely difficult.
Leo Depuydt has said that the
document is a forgery and that the forger rearranged several sentences in the
Gospel of Thomas and unintentionally left evidence of his fraudulent work. The
evidence is simply overwhelming that the GJW document is a fraud. So, does this
mean that Karen King will apologize, recant, or admit to her poor scholarship
in this case? Unbelief is a very powerful motivation for rejecting the truth
claims of Christian theism. Apparently, Professor King thinks that since there
remains an infinitesimally small chance that the scrap is authentic, that this
virtually guarantees it is. The evidence is in and all the scientific tests put
to this document shows that it is not authentic and clearly demonstrates we
have no reason to believe it is authentic.
Now, if this gives you great
comfort where anxiety existed over this particular claim, I would submit that
it is paramount that you reexamine your faith. Moreover, I believe you would
benefit from a very rigorous examination of your view of Scripture as well as
the way in which you interpret it. If your faith is in God, then your
confidence in the fidelity of Scripture does not rest in science. It rests in
the faithfulness and trustworthiness of God. You should read an article like
this and not be surprised, even a little. Those people that know Scripture know
that Jesus never had a wife. Moreover, we do not care if a first-century
manuscript showed up claiming that Jesus was married. We would rule it out as
false, not based on scientific investigation, but because it contradicts
Scripture. If science dictates what you will and will not believe from Scripture,
then Jesus is not your God, science is. And if science is your god, you my
friend, are an idolater.
Authentic Christianity
passionately holds to the highest view of Scripture. Christians are the ones
running around always talking about the Bible. You can hear them answer every
question beginning with "the Bible says." They are radical in how
often they employ Scripture in their discussions. In fact, authentic Christians
rub people the wrong way because they are always going back to the Bible for
their answers. They appeal to the Bible to settle disagreements and disputes.
No method that places the Bible aside for the sake of conversation and argument
is a safe or proper method where the Christian is concerned.
Good science always agrees with
the divine revelation of Scripture. Any science that calls into question the
fidelity of Sacred Scripture deserves to be called into question itself. Have
faith in God. (Mk. 11:22)
No comments:
Post a Comment