On occasion I have railed about
the attitude of the younger generation, especially in the areas of
submissiveness and outright arrogance. The two, in my opinion, are
interrelated. Recently, I ran across an interesting article that talked about
the research results related to the younger generation. The article calls them
the "Me Me Me Generation." In an article published by Time Magazine
on May 20th, 2013, Joel Stein begins the revelation of statistics
with this fact: "The incidence of narcissistic personality disorder is
nearly three times as high for people in their 20s as for the generation that's
now 65 or older. In fact, 58% more college students scored higher on a
narcissism scale in 2009 than in 1982.
According to a 2012 study by
Clark University, more people ages 18-29 live with their parents than with a
spouse. In addition, a 1992 study found that 80% of people under the age of 23
wanted a job with greater responsibility compared to just 60% ten years later.
Stein's report targets millennials, people born between 1980 and 2000. Average
American family of the 50's may have displayed a wedding photo, a school photo,
and maybe a military photo in their homes. Today, the average middle-class
American family walks amid 85 photos of themselves and their pets. Millennials
have less civic involvement and lower political participation than any previous
group.
Scores of creativity and empathy
are falling sharply among millennials. It seems apparent that social media like
Facebook and Twitter have created a false sense of accomplishment and worth.
It's all about friends, likes, and followers. While Stein goes on to express
what I would call a blind optimism about the generation's future, I admittedly
cannot follow him. My focus is different. The mantra of millennials has been
"challenge convention." And they have certainly been busy doing just
that. The question is how has the millennial culture impacts the Christian
community. Where is the expression of this attitude in the Church?
We can begin with what was known
as the "seeker-movement." This movement recognized the trends in the "Me
Me Me generation" even before it was in full bloom and adjusted
accordingly. Church had to change and remain culturally relevant if it was
going to survive. It matters not that Jesus Himself guaranteed that even
something as power as the gates of hell would not prevail against His Church,
many modern pastors, having all but lost their faith, embraced the new model.
The Church had to change its music, its programs, its lighting, and even its
message. And everything was geared toward the so-called "seeker." The
sinner needed to feel that it was all about them.
The next phase to emerge was of
course, the emerging church movement. This movement was one more adaptation or
perhaps several, of how Christianity was being defined. The convention and
tradition of the older generation, the great conservative movements and
scholars were dismissed with amazing unabashed prejudice. Change for the sake
of being different seemed to be the cadence of this movement. Scripture was
displaced and in its stead, a full-orbed narcissistic post-modern message and
philosophy took its place. The God of the OT was viewed as something altogether
different from Jesus. Many passages were rejected on the basis that they were
not in keeping with modern sensitivities. Gone were the doctrines of wrath,
hell, and the idea of a penal-substitutionary atonement. The immediate response
when one quotes Calvin or one of the other great theologians is "who needs
these old, unsophisticated men" with their primitive ideas and theology.
The notion that we are superior because, well we say we are, embraced without
critical reflection. What does Calvin or Luther, or Augustine have to say to us?
Not only was traditional dogma dismissed, but the methods and techniques for
arriving at these truths have also been abandoned. Seminaries spend much more
time on psychology, business, and management than they do on languages and
exegesis and even systematics.
Finally, enter the young, the
restless, and the reformed. First of all, while I know there are exceptions to
this rule, I find it a good general rule of thought that the minute someone
begins to define themselves as different, new, outside the pale, that it is
likely that I am talking to one of these narcissistic types whose ego just
needs that sort of feeling. Think about that. Why can't we just be disciples
and followers of Christ? We can't just be a Calvinist, or Arminian, or a
Baptist or a Presbyterian. Something inside the narcissist insists on not only
redefining things, but also on being the one to do so. It does not matter that
there is no real impact to anyone or anything in reality. All that matters is
that in the mind of the narcissist, they have made their contribution. All that matters is that someone notices them.
All that seems to matter is that they count.
The young, the restless, and the
reformed are indeed an odd bunch. They range from sound, reformed folks to
nearly outright heretics. They have redefined the boundaries for the most part.
Unlike their counter-parts in the emerging church, they maintain a high view of
Scripture, but like those counter-parts, they mangle it so that in the end, it
is unrecognizable. Take the wholesale acceptance of TD Jakes for example, an
unrepentant heretic that is embraced by more than a small portion of the YRR.
The seeker movement, the
emerging church, and the young, restless, reformed all have close connections
with cultural shifts of the "Me Me Me Generation we call millennials. While the emerging church is by far the most extreme expression of the
millennial hijacking of Christianity, the other movements have done little to slow the shift. While their statements hold Scripture in high regard, their actions
show, at times, an utter contempt for Scripture. The view of God and all things
holy seems to be utterly common to some within the seeker and YRR movements.
This is a product of the Me focus among millennials. They seem to think they
have a right to touch everything, anytime, anywhere they please and that
includes the nature of God. One of the reasons I think John Piper is so popular
among this crowd is because his views on Christian hedonism fits perfectly with
a "Me-focused" generation. This generation is certainly interested in their pleasure and if they can spin Piper's hedonism just a little, well, why not jump on that train?
One of the biggest problems I
see within these movements is their understanding of the Church. I do not see
anything remotely resembling a biblical ecclesiology. Many of these churches
require members to sign confidentiality agreements around Church finances.
There is no transparency. One of those Churches just stood by and watched their
young pastor build a 16,000 square foot mansion on the south side of Charlotte, NC.
I drive by that church every Wednesday on my way to a men's bible study. In
addition, the idea of submissiveness, discipline, and coming under others in
authority over them seems completely lacking among these young leaders. Well, that believe in submission so long as it is to them and their hand-picked boards.
How is culture affecting and
shaping your views and opinions on God, Christ, Man, Sin, and Scripture? How do
you see yourself before the throne of a holy God? Is God your daddy who wants
you to have a high view of yourself and wants to spoil you with materialism,
status and the American dream? Are the songs and sermons that move you only
those songs and sermons that talk about you, your dreams, your hopes, and your
goals? Do you get excited only when you think God is all about making your life
fabulous? Or, is it the cross and the amazing and incredible display of God's
justice and mercy that come together there that move you more than anything
else moves you? Where is your focus? Is it on God or on you? Is God's own glory
enough for you or must there be something else in it for you? Is your greatest
desire God's glory? Or, is your greatest desire God's glory when it means your
enjoyment in temporal things, be they relationships, careers, money, power, and
popularity?
And do not be conformed to this world,
but be transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what the
will of God is, that which is good and acceptable and perfect. (Rom. 12:2)
No comments:
Post a Comment