In my last post, I introduced the concept of sovereignty in
my argument for a presuppositional defense of the claim that the Bible is the
Word of God. This is a critical component in the argument because it is
indelibly linked to the nature of the God that is, that God that we have already
shown to exist due to the impossibility of the contrary. I have said that only
Christian theism provides the preconditions necessary for human predication as
well as the intelligibility of human experience.
One by one the efforts of the non-Christian worldview have
taken their place in the section of philosophy reserved for irrational beliefs.
This will continue to be the case with any view that attempts to contradict the
truth claims of Christian theism. The reason is really quite basic: Christian
theism is true. The subject of our present series however, is how do we as
Christians move from the truth of Christian theism to affirming that the Bible,
the book of Christianity, is the Word of God. And how do we do that while
remaining faithful to Scripture and consistent with the presuppositional
framework I have set forth?
First, we must inquire what Christian theism affirms about
the question. If Christian theism is the only true worldview that humanity
should embrace, and if this system is the only essential expression of truth
and the only way for man to possess genuine knowledge, then it follows that we
must look to this system to see if it furnishes some assistance around the
question we are tackling.
There is no philosophical argument available that will bring
a person to genuine knowledge that the Bible is the Word of God. Recall that we
said knowledge, properly defined is 1) It is in fact the case; 2) I believe it is
the case; and 3) I have reasonable grounds for believing it is the case. One
may wrongly infer that (3) asserts that a person can and should arrive at the
conclusion that the Bible is the Word of God by rational means. That would be reading
more into (3) than is necessary. Second, (3) will turn on how one defines “reasonable
grounds.” To defend the claim that the Bible is the Word of God, we have no
recourse but to turn to Scripture itself. The reason we must turn to Scripture
itself is due to the fact that Christian theism contends that Scripture is
self-authenticating, self-vindicating, authoritative, our final source of
appeal for what qualifies as true knowledge, that it is in fact the standard
and source of how humans know anything at all not only about the world, but how
we should go about constructing our very theory of knowledge to begin with. By
what standard then do we call into question the precise basis for how we know
anything?
To where then do we turn to put forward the case that the
Bible is the Word of God? It could rightly be said that we are dealing with a
question that maybe does not require an answer. Some theologians believe that
those who know the truthfulness of this statement do not need an argument based
in logic or human reason to support their belief and that those who do not,
cannot possibly be convinced by any argument put forth for the claim regardless
of it cogency or rational persuasiveness. This is a fair and perhaps keen
observation to which we shall return shortly.
Writing some 500 years ago, John Calvin said, “Nearly all
wisdom we possess, that is to say, true and sound wisdom, consists of two
parts: the knowledge of God and of ourselves.” [Calvin, Institutes, I.i.1] For
the reformer, the key to knowledge rests in our knowledge of God and our
knowledge of ourselves. This begs the question, how do we possess this
knowledge? “There is within the human mind, and indeed by natural instinct, an
awareness of divinity. This we take to be beyond controversy. To prevent anyone
from taking refuge in the pretense of ignorance, God himself has implanted in
all men a certain understanding of his divine majesty.” [Ibid. I.iii.1]
Christian theism asserts that human knowledge comes, not through empiricism nor
through a bankrupt system of autonomous human reason, rather, all knowledge
comes through divine revelation. God makes Himself known to man and reveals to
man, makes available to man everything that man understands about Himself, the
created order, and God. While God’s self-disclosure serves as the basis of all
knowledge, it is true that not all knowledge is acquired in the same manner. This
Christian theism admits. Some things we know by way of induction and inference.
We know that the Sun will rise tomorrow. Other things we know by experience. We
know that fire is hot, ice is cold, and they each provide a unique experience
when encountered in certain ways. Just as we know these things in their own
respective way, we also know God according to His own method of self-disclosure.
We know Christ in this way. We have not so learned Christ from the philosophers,
or, the logicians, or the scientists. Should it come as a surprise that we
should learn the Scripture as the Word of God any differently?
What I have been driving at is the fundamental difference
between the nature of Scripture as the Word of God and the proposition that
Scripture is the Word of God. The former dictates how we should go about
finding our answer to the question. One philosopher argues, “…theists are right
in affirming the reality of God but wrong in insisting that His reality is
capable of proof.” [Halverson, A Concise Introduction to Philosophy, 174] We must
stare the traditional response in the face and ask if it is proper for the
Christian to attempt to prove that Scripture is the Word of God by means of scientific
reason. Is this the way we ought to tackle the question? I do not think it is.
All of reality, to include human reality is a manifestation,
a disclosure of sorts. There are categories of disclosure, such as physical
reality, and the reality of human minds, and also the reality of moral law.
That there are different ways for how these disclosures appear to us is indisputable.
For example, the reality of other minds is beyond the ability of scientific
reason to verify. But it is nonetheless true.
The traditional approach to the question of Scripture as the
Word of God attempts to put this fundamental awareness of the reality of
Scripture and its nature into a form of argument that is acceptable to
scientific reason and to autonomous human logic. It is because both of these
methods are exactly the wrong category, and because both of these methods
employ, in the unbeliever’s worldview, presuppositions that are dismissive of
the claim prior to even having the discussion, that the effort is doomed before
the project can even get going. Just as science and reason have their starting
point, the foundation for what qualifies as knowledge, so too we may say the
same about Scripture. We do not place the nature of the claim into a class and
then subject it to scrutiny. Instead, we acknowledge, just as we acknowledge
the tree outside the window, that Scripture is the Word of God. Scripture is
not only the product of divine revelation; it is divine revelation. How then do
we acquire this knowledge that the Bible is the Word of God?
Jesus Himself addressed this explicitly in John 10:3-5. The
sheep hear the voice of God, and they follow Him. The sheep follow Him because
they know His voice. The sheep, by nature, will not chase after the voice of a
stranger. So then, how do these sheep know God’s voice? The sine qua non
of embracing the Bible as the Word of God is simply this: He who is of God
hears the words of God; for this reason you do not hear them, because
you are not of God.” (John 8:47) Only those who have been born again can, and
will genuinely affirm the Bible to be the Word of God.
From a presuppositional standpoint, all knowledge comes
through divine disclosure. God discloses knowledge about Himself, His creation,
and humanity to humanity. This revelation takes two distinct forms: natural and
special. The natural revelation of God has been disclosed to all humanity by
means of man’s conscience and by means of the creation all about him. Man knows
God, himself, science, reason, logic, morality, love, etc. because they are
components of natural revelation. Justification for revelation is unnecessary
since revelation is the ground to which the chain of justification is anchored.
It is on the ground of God’s revelation that justification serves rather than
legislates.
In the same way that the unbeliever knows that God exists, what
we call the sensus divinitatis, the believer knows God’s word. He recognizes
God’s voice just like a sheep recognizes the voice of His shepherd. He knows
it. He knows it not because he has subjected it to empirical, historical, and
rational scrutiny and argumentation. He knows it because God has made sure He
knows it the same way God makes sure that every human knows He exists.
Paul informs us that the gospel of Christ is one thing to
the believer (power of God unto salvation) and quite the opposite to the
unbeliever (foolishness and scandalous). (1 Cor. 1:18) Paul also informs us
that it will not be through intellectually compelling and persuasive arguments
that the world will come to believe this truth about the Bible. (1 Cor. 1:21)
You see the linchpin of this question is not science, it is not historical evidence,
it is not human reason. Instead, the linchpin is faith. (1 Cor. 2:4-5) 1 Thess.
2:13 tells us that the believers in Thessalonica received the Bible for what it
really is, the Word of God.
The demand for justification according to the standards set
forth by science, and by autonomous human reason cannot be imposed on the
Christian claim with any legitimacy. It is no secret that science and reason
serve as their own foundation for human knowledge and they too reach a place
where justification is not offered and for that matter, not possible. The Bible
is the Word of God and this Christian theism affirms without hesitation. If you
want to convince men of this truth, the only way to go about it is to give them
the gospel. Only God, through divine intervention can bring one to the place
where they are not blind to the tree outside their window. The Bible is not
subject human testing and judgment so that we can know that it is the Word of
God. If it were, it would not be the Word of God. Quite the contrary, because
the Bible is the Word of God, it is the standard by which all other claims to
knowledge must be tested.
Christian theism is true because of the impossibility of the
contrary. God is the necessary precondition for the intelligibility of human
experience. Without God, human predication would be impossible. God has
disclosed Himself to us in nature and in Scripture. Without these disclosures, humanity
would be hopelessly ignorant of anything and everything around him, including itself. I will defend the nature of Scripture when unbelievers can defend the basis of their attack against it. And this they cannot do. If the history of philosophy has proven anything, it has proven that man simply cannot account for reality and for human knowledge as we experience it apart from God.
No comments:
Post a Comment